Last Updated: 8/20/2025
Written By: Sanskriti Pandey (Senior Marketing Analyst)
Reviewed By: Sam Salia (Founder and Pharmacist)
When a brand enters the dietary supplement space, one of the first and most decisive questions is how to produce its products. Should it build an in-house facility to control every detail, or should it partner with an established supplement manufacturer? The choice sounds simple, but it shapes the company’s future in profound ways. Summit Rx is a vertically integrated supplement manufacturer based in the US.
This blog does not aim to crown one method as superior. Instead, it explores both paths while weaving in examples of how businesses at different stages might make their decision.
The Appeal of In-House Production
The U.S. dietary supplements market size was estimated at USD 63.92 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 124.22 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 7.7% from 2025 to 2033. Owning your own production facility can feel like having the ultimate power over your brand. You dictate formulations, oversee ingredient sourcing, and control the packaging line. For some founders, this sense of control is worth any cost.
But the costs are rarely small. Building a compliant manufacturing plant requires millions in upfront capital, not to mention ongoing spending on certifications, staff training, audits, and maintenance. Beyond dollars, it demands deep technical expertise—chemists, engineers, quality managers—all of whom need to stay aligned with constantly changing regulations.
Example: The Enterprise Brand
Imagine a well-established global supplement brand with hundreds of SKUs and distribution in major retailers. For them, investing in a GMP-certified facility makes sense. They have the capital, they need full flexibility for custom formulations, and they can achieve economies of scale once production ramps up. Over time, their own facility might even turn into a profit center if they take on contract manufacturing for smaller brands.
Why Many Brands Partner with Supplement Manufacturers
For most supplement companies, especially at the early stages, in-house production is unrealistic. That is where contract manufacturers step in. These facilities already operate under GMP compliance, employ skilled staff, and maintain robust systems for raw material testing, blending, encapsulation, and bottling. At Summit Rx, our strong R&D team creates samples for your brand and can play around with taste, flavor, color, texture, and more.
This approach lowers the barrier to entry dramatically. A founder with a strong concept can bring a product to market without needing to learn machinery maintenance or invest in stability testing labs. Instead, they can focus on their strength: branding, storytelling, and consumer engagement.
Example: The Startup Brand
Consider a new entrepreneur with an innovative idea for an organic sleep supplement. They have strong marketing skills but limited capital. Partnering with a supplement manufacturer allows them to test their concept, launch quickly, and adapt to customer feedback without being burdened by the heavy machinery of production. Without such a partnership, their idea might never make it past the concept stage.
The Middle Ground: Hybrid Approaches
Some companies take a hybrid route. They may start with a manufacturer to validate demand, then gradually bring selective processes in-house. For example, they might outsource capsule production but handle packaging and labeling internally to save costs and keep tighter control over branding. Others experiment with small pilot facilities to test new formats, like functional drinks or gummies, while leaving mass production to a partner.
Example: The Mid-Sized Brand
Think of a regional supplement company that has grown steadily over a decade. They started by outsourcing everything, but now that they have a loyal customer base, they bring packaging and some small-batch R&D in-house. This setup allows them to experiment while still relying on their manufacturer for large-scale runs. They strike a balance—controlling what matters most while avoiding the burden of full-scale facility management.
Comparison of Supplement Manufacturer vs In-House Production
| Factor | Partnering with a Supplement Manufacturer | Building In-House Production Facility |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront Investment | Low to moderate; mostly product development and order costs | Very high; millions in equipment, facility setup, and licenses |
| Time to Market | Fast; can launch within months | Slow; can take years to build, certify, and stabilize |
| Expertise Required | Minimal technical expertise; rely on manufacturer’s team | Extensive; need chemists, engineers, and compliance staff |
| Regulatory Compliance | Handled by manufacturer (with brand oversight) | Full responsibility on the brand |
| Scalability | Flexible; scale up or down with demand | Limited by facility capacity; expansion requires investment |
| Customization | Moderate; limited to manufacturer’s capabilities | High; complete control over formulation and processes |
| Operational Risks | Shared with manufacturer; reduced burden on brand | Carried entirely by brand; breakdowns and recalls are direct risks |
| Focus | Allows focus on branding, marketing, and sales | Diverts focus to operations and compliance |
| Long-Term Costs | Higher per-unit cost over time | Lower per-unit cost once scaled, but higher fixed expenses |
| Best Fit For | Startups, small to mid-sized brands, companies prioritizing speed | Established enterprises with capital, expertise, and scale |
Risk, Responsibility, and the Bigger Picture
In-house production means carrying every ounce of responsibility. A failed audit, an equipment breakdown, or a contamination issue can halt production and lead to costly recalls. Regulatory compliance alone can overwhelm even well-prepared businesses.
By contrast, manufacturers carry much of this operational burden. They have established systems that minimize risks for their partners. However, outsourcing does not absolve brands of responsibility—choosing the wrong manufacturer can lead to delays, inconsistent quality, or reputational damage. Summit Rx operates in a cGMP-certified and FDA registered 47,000 sq.ft. facility.
The difference lies in where you want to focus your energy. Do you see your company as primarily a supplement manufacturer that also sells a brand, or as a brand that uses experts to bring products to life? Both identities are valid, but they require different mindsets.
Choosing the Right Path
The decision between supplement manufacturing and in-house production often reflects a company’s stage of growth.
-
A startup benefits from speed and low entry costs by outsourcing.
-
A mid-sized company may explore hybrid options for flexibility.
-
An enterprise brand can justify the investment in its own facility to maintain total control.
There is no single right answer. The right choice depends on aligning your resources with your ambitions, and your appetite for risk with your strategy for growth.
Decision Framework: Should You Choose a Supplement Manufacturer or In-House Production?
You can use this decision framework to choose the best option that works for your brand:
Step 1: Evaluate Your Budget
-
If your available capital is under $1–2 million → Supplement manufacturer is the practical path.
-
If you can invest several million upfront and sustain high operating costs → In-house may be viable.
Step 2: Assess Your Expertise
-
If your team is marketing and sales-oriented with little technical or regulatory background → Manufacturer is better.
-
If your team includes chemists, QA managers, and compliance experts → In-house becomes realistic.
Step 3: Consider Your Timeline
-
If you need products ready within 6–12 months → Supplement manufacturer offers faster entry.
-
If you can wait 2–3 years for facility setup and certification → In-house can be considered.
Step 4: Think About Your Risk Tolerance
-
If you prefer lower operational risk and shared responsibility → Supplement manufacturer is safer.
-
If you are comfortable bearing compliance, recalls, and audit risks → In-house gives full control.
Step 5: Align with Growth Goals
-
If your goal is to test the market, grow brand presence, and remain flexible → Manufacturer is the right match.
-
If your long-term vision includes scaling to large volumes, offering custom formats, or even manufacturing for other brands → In-house could be a strategic investment.
Final Thoughts
The supplement industry rewards speed, quality, and adaptability. In-house production offers total control but demands enormous investment and technical depth. Working with a manufacturer lowers barriers, reduces risks, and lets brands focus on consumers, but requires trust and careful partner selection. Hybrid models allow some flexibility but add complexity.
Ultimately, success does not come from whether a brand manufactures or outsources. It comes from clarity—knowing what role you want your company to play and building a foundation that supports that role.
For some, that means investing in a gleaming facility with stainless steel lines and in-house labs. For others, it means finding a reliable manufacturing partner who can turn ideas into reality while the brand builds its presence in the marketplace. In either case, the winning formula is strategy, not just production. Request a quote with us today!
References
U.S. Dietary Supplements Market Size & Share [2023 Report]. (2022). Www.grandviewresearch.com. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-dietary-supplements-market-report
PWC. (2020). Vitamins & Dietary Supplements Market trends -Overview PwC Deals PwC | Vitamins & Dietary Supplements Market trends Overview. https://www.pwc.com/it/it/publications/assets/docs/Vitamins-Dietary-Supplements-Market-Overview.pdf
Dietary Supplements and Nutritional Products. (2023). Nsf.org; NSF. https://www.nsf.org/th/en/nutrition-wellness/dietary-supplements-nutritional-products?serviceType=certification